doomtothee
quality posts: 44
Private Messages
This guy says some of the pictures he took were too good. "Makes you think you're on something!"
[MOD: embedded video for you]
Woot won't let me have a cool signature
ckeilah
quality posts: 138
Private Messages
4:3 and 16:9 different sizes but same pixel count? Error!
[MOD: Fixed. Thanks for pointing that out. ]
Please do not increment my Quality Posts count. 69 is a good place to be. ;-)
MOD: We had to...we just HAD TO...
smallbigtall
quality posts: 4
Private Messages
Not cool, woot. The green "sold out" three days ago in the woot-off and I had to settle for red, but now the green, let alone the camera itself, is magically reappeared?
In the good old days, "sold out" meant sold out, not "on hold for two days."
five Barack Obama Charities and counting | 07.12.09 | 12.09.09 | 03.09.11 | 09.14.11 | 04.26.12
radi0j0hn
quality posts: 78
Private Messages
EvilE1174 wrote:Only 3x optical zoom??? Pass.......
Not everyone needs a 20X optical zoom. Especially if you are doing portraits, macro shots, etc.
And a long lens on a light, small camera is hard to hold steady.
Now, if you are shooting wildlife it's a different matter, but to each his/her/it's own.
acpress.com Not cute, but useful.
radi0j0hn
quality posts: 78
Private Messages
[Always read the camera specifications and get a basic understanding of the relationship between f/stops, shutter speeds and ISOs if you plan to attempt anything more challenging than snapshots.]
For example:
"Capture the details in low-light conditions and fast-action situations with high ISO (up to 1000)"
This might have been a selling point in 2000, but NOT in 2013!!
Today, many cameras now hit 12,800 ISO. Tons of cheapies hit 1,600 and 3,200.
Why is this important?
At ISO 1000, and with the typical f/5.6 lens found on most 3x zoom cameras, you would be lucky to shoot at 1/60th of a second indoors with no flash.
That is not fast enough to stop action, and barely fast enough for most people to hold steady.
Outdoors would be OK. Using with flash would be OK.
Also, images at the high end of the ISO ladder are usually not as good looking as a couple of steps down, say, ISO 400. If you needed ISO 1000 a lot, you'd be shooting at the high end all the time.
For those aspiring to shoot in the gym, this is NOT, NOT, NOT the camera for you.
acpress.com Not cute, but useful.